On Nov 8, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > >>>>>> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:06:12 +0000 >>>>>> Rui Paulo <[email protected]> said: > > rpaulo> It's on my plans, but basename_r is not POSIX and there was a private > discussion about it a couple of weeks ago. The conclusion is that we should > adopt the Android semantics of basename_r(). > > I found the thread, and understood it. However, I still wonderling if > breaking thread-safeness in proc_sym.c is okay, though it may not be > necessary.
We can live with it for now while I work on a new basename_r(). Regards, -- Rui Paulo _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
