Hi, >>>>> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:06:12 +0000 >>>>> Rui Paulo <[email protected]> said:
rpaulo> It's on my plans, but basename_r is not POSIX and there was a private discussion about it a couple of weeks ago. The conclusion is that we should adopt the Android semantics of basename_r(). I found the thread, and understood it. However, I still wonderling if breaking thread-safeness in proc_sym.c is okay, though it may not be necessary. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan [email protected] u...@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
