I’m not familiar with all the details, but an F5 is probably an overkill and you can acomplish the same thing with quite a simple nginx setup. ;-)
> On 1 Oct 2020, at 21:51, Chirana Gheorghita Eugeniu Theodor > <[email protected]> wrote: > > This can solve the issue of transaction loss if a switch from active to > standby ocures. But I think there are also some open source variants of the F5 > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2020, 22:49 Chirana Gheorghita Eugeniu Theodor > <[email protected]> wrote: > The virtual version of the F5 bigip load balacer. The vm can be run in any > virtial enviroment. > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2020, 22:06 Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Oct 1, 2020, at 11:23 AM, Chirana Gheorghita Eugeniu Theodor wrote: > > > > Or we could sponsor a F5 bigip virtual appliance and that should solve the > > load balancing. Correct me if I am wrong. > > I don't even know what that is :-) > > /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
