On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 03:39:30PM +0200, Matthias Heinrichs wrote: > Am 13.07.2017 um 15:03 schrieb Dirk Hohndel: > > It tries to associate Bluetooth names (and the correspondong addresses) > > with known patterns for dive computer names. I'm actually surprised that > > this didn't end up with an error that it can't determine the address - but > > maybe the slightly odd BT names of the OSTC devices worked out in our > > favor here and it was misdetected? > > I'd prefer a small pop-up with a list to choose from (Detected devices). > Makes this all a bit more robust and future proof. In case /we/ choose the > rename the newest model different /again/.
Dive computer makers so far have not shown a lot of care when it comes to naming their devices on BT/BLE - so yes, we'll have to come up with something better. > Divemate had the same problems and they now keep a list of all possible BT > names in their code. I still use one of the earliest OSTC3 BLE prototypes > personally and it still has it's default name like "BlueMod+SR", for > example. Cringe. Yeah, I get your point. I'll work on that prior to the final Subsurface-mobile 2.0 release. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
