Am 13.07.2017 um 15:03 schrieb Dirk Hohndel:
It tries to associate Bluetooth names (and the correspondong addresses)
with known patterns for dive computer names. I'm actually surprised that
this didn't end up with an error that it can't determine the address - but
maybe the slightly odd BT names of the OSTC devices worked out in our
favor here and it was misdetected?
I'd prefer a small pop-up with a list to choose from (Detected devices).
Makes this all a bit more robust and future proof. In case /we/ choose
the rename the newest model different /again/.
Divemate had the same problems and they now keep a list of all possible
BT names in their code. I still use one of the earliest OSTC3 BLE
prototypes personally and it still has it's default name like
"BlueMod+SR", for example.
Regards,
Matthias
--
heinrichs weikamp gmbh * Adlerstr. 7 * 79098 Freiburg * Germany
Amtsgericht Freiburg HRB 713558 * Gerichtsstand Freiburg im Breisgau
Geschäftsführer: Matthias Heinrichs, Christian Weikamp
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
