> On Jan 17, 2017, at 9:27 AM, Willem Ferguson > <[email protected]> wrote: > I totally understand that feeling. I myself have developed stuff in the past > that had very limited usage. Is it worth it? > > But, on the other hand I think there is a wider perspective. All the little > things that may have fairly limited use, e.g. the mobile versions, import > facilities, etc in sum provide an environment that makes initial users more > likely to choose Subsurface or to stick to it. These are the sort of thing > that add a lot of value and, for instance, have made DAN Europe turn to > Subsurface for many of their import requirements and initial assessment > requirements.
Yes, I agree. As you saw, I looked into it, but stopped when things crashed for me. > In addition, there is the fact that, 10 years from now, most users will > possibly not have a desktop or laptop as we know it today and that the mobile > version will be the most used one because we will have 8-core mobile > processors with a 2000 x 1000 mobile screen and we may just add a peripheral > or two to a mobile. My personal view is that any time spent on the mobile > versions is a long term investment. That is what I'm telling myself (except that there already are 8core phones out there, as are tablets with 2560x1600 screen resolution) > With all this, I guess I am just trying to say: you have not been wasting > your time. Thank you /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
