On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:05:25AM +0200, Willem Ferguson wrote: > Would it require a lot of time to create an AppImage of this tool? As far as > I can make out, it is built as a special case of the "normal" Subsurface > build, the main difference being the requirement for two additional > libraries. I cannot see that this AppImage build would need any real > maintenance because the regular updates and patches to Subsurface are > unlikely to affect the import process (unless of course the xml/ssrf format > itself changes). One could simply call this AppImage something like > smtk2ssrf_v4.6 so that we know it was derived from Subsurface v4.6. Am I > being naïve?
I haven't looked into it, but it does not seem to be too hard. As everything else that I do (that all of us do), it's all a matter of time. What should I be spending my "Subsurface time" on? How many people will actually want to use that AppImage? /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
