Hello Simon, On Monday, June 02, 2003, Simon Bryan wrote... >> Yes, I've tried that, and the same spam did not get caught even >> though I tried filtering it with a second pass. BTW, Simon Bryan >> did mention however that "SpamAssassin" needed to be installed >> before the SpamFilter functionality included with 1.4.0 would work, >> and I have just set this up (spamassassin is now running as daemon >> on the system). Still doesn't seem to work however on my test spam. >> :|
> Watch a listing of 'top' on a terminal window while sending the test > spam (using the ones supplied with SA) see if spamc jumps up. Also > look at the Full Headers to see if SA is writing its info into > there, it should do this for every email. Haven't got soemthing like > [EMAIL PROTECTED] in your whitelist? Even if you have [EMAIL PROTECTED] in your whitelist, SA still tags the mail, just adds a large negative number to the results to offset the bad tagged mail. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
