Hello! Yes, I've tried that, and the same spam did not get caught even though I tried filtering it with a second pass. BTW, Simon Bryan did mention however that "SpamAssassin" needed to be installed before the SpamFilter functionality included with 1.4.0 would work, and I have just set this up (spamassassin is now running as daemon on the system). Still doesn't seem to work however on my test spam. :|
Micheal C. > Hello Michael, > On Saturday, May 31, 2003, Michael wrote... > >> Has anyone noticed that the included Spam Filters included into core >> 1.4.0 SquirrelMail does not "work"? I haven't had a single spam >> caught within the past month that I've used 1.4.0. I've even went so >> far as to click almost every single spam filter. > >> It seems as if other people, when using even a few of the filters, >> experience some lag time when refreshing the folder list; however I >> don't seem to have this. Not sure what this means, but my guess is >> that it isn't even trying to quiery the spam databases.... > > Doesn't necessarily mean that the filter doesn't work... More recently > I've had a _lot_ of spam getting around spamassassin very easily, > which is rather annoying as I used to get nearly 100 pieces of spam a > day before deploying it, which dropped nicely to 1 a week, and is now > back up to 25 a week. Either the spammers are getting better, or the > method of catching them is starting to crumble. > > As a method of testing, can you view some of the spam that got through > the spam filter, and verify that it would normally have been caught? > > -- > Jon Angliss > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
