Hello Linux, On Thursday, March 06, 2003, Linux Doctor wrote... > Is 1.4.x going to be the follow-on to the 1.2.x versions?
> I'm not sure if both these versions are proceeding in parallel, or > if the 1.2.x versions will be replaced by 1.4.x. I'm curious because > the release date on 1.2.11 is newer than that for 1.4.0. 1.4.0 hasn't been released yet... only candidates... but your observation was partially correct. I had released 1.2.11 shortly after the 1.4RC2a release... This does seem a little confusing until you read the reason for it's release. The 1.2 branch is only going to be maintained in respect of big bugs, and security issues. I'll probably continue to maintain parts of that myself, with maybe Thijs doing a little work if he's up to it. 1.4 is the way we're heading, and will be the next release. Any further releases from 1.2 will be bug fixes and security updates. > I'll be upgrading soon from 1.2.8... is it best to skip 1.2.11 and > go directly to 1.4.0? How stable is the 1.4.0 "candidate?" I'd > prefer not to go through 1.2.11 if we'll all end up at 1.4.0 anyway. > Thanks! Neall It depends on how much dependency you have on plugins at the moment. There are some plugins that just won't work with 1.4, but authors should be updating them. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
