Quoting Linux Doctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Is 1.4.x going to be the follow-on to the 1.2.x versions? >
Yes, 1.3.x was an unstable/development series. 1.2.x and 1.4.x are stable versions. (This numbering scheme, odd minor revs for development, even for stable, is common, especially in Linux related packages.) > I'm not sure if both these versions are proceeding in parallel, or if the > 1.2.x versions will be replaced by 1.4.x. I'm curious because the release > date on 1.2.11 is newer than that for 1.4.0. > 1.4.0 is proceeding thru release candidates. It currently is up to release candidate 2, RC2. > I'll be upgrading soon from 1.2.8... is it best to skip 1.2.11 and go > directly to 1.4.0? How stable is the 1.4.0 "candidate?" I'd prefer not > to go through 1.2.11 if we'll all end up at 1.4.0 anyway. Thanks! Neall > No, 1.4.0 release candidate 2 is not ready for prime time. I went precisely this route, 1.2.8 to 1.2.11. If you want to update, 1.2.11 is the way to go. If you want to try the 1.4 series, it is easy to have both. Also, not all plugins are available for 1.4 yet. HTH, Jeffrey ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
