Hi all!

as a little defense to suse folks, SuSE _does_ ship with version 3, but
it is clearly stated as BETA, SuSE also ships with squid version 2. They
simply give you the choice.

Best Regards!

On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 08:54, Mrvka Andreas wrote:
> i found out, authentication via squid_ldap_auth works without using auth_param 
> ntlm.
> 
> i also found in this mailing list, that i cannot simply test ntlm with my 
> script i wrote in my mail at the bottom.
> 
> furthermore, if i browse with MS IE then i get an entry in log with user NONE
> and nothing more...  the webpage also loads and loads and........
> 
> it seems for me that the two pcs are talking together, as i can see in 
> ethereal. 
> 
> for your info.
> i see in /var/log/messages the following:
> 
> Aug 25 14:17:41 proxy2 -- MARK --
> Aug 25 14:26:42 proxy2 squid[9438]: assertion failed: ntlm/auth_ntlm.cc:962: 
> "authenticateRequestRefCount(conn->auth_user_request) == 1"
> Aug 25 14:26:42 proxy2 squid[9330]: Squid Parent: child process 9438 exited 
> due to signal 6
> Aug 25 14:26:45 proxy2 squid[9330]: Squid Parent: child process 9472 started
> Aug 25 14:26:45 proxy2 squid[9472]: Starting Squid Cache version 3.0-PRE3 for 
> i686-pc-linux-gnu...
> Aug 25 14:26:45 proxy2 squid[9472]: Process ID 9472
> 
> 
> please help,
> andrew
> 
> 
> Am Mittwoch, 25. August 2004 12:38 schrieb Mrvka Andreas:
> > hi list,
> >
> [...]
> 
> > auth_param ntlm program /usr/sbin/ntlm_auth -b DOMAIN/PDC DOMAIN/BDC
> >
> >
> > for testing i use:
> >
> > echo "user pass" | /usr/sbin/ntlm_auth -d DOMAIN\\PDC
> > ntlm-auth[6099](ntlm_auth.c:188): Adding domain-controller DOMAIN\\PDC
> > ntlm-auth[6099](ntlm_auth.c:461): options processed OK
> > ntlm-auth[6099](ntlm_auth.c:285): managing request
> > ntlm-auth[6099](ntlm_auth.c:291): ntlm authenticator. Got 'user pass' from
> > Squid
> > ntlm-auth[6099](ntlm_auth.c:441): sending 'BH Helper detected protocol
> > error' to squid
> > BH Helper detected protocol error
> > fgets() failed! dying..... errno=0 (Success)
> >
> >
> > what can i do?
> >
> > regards
> > andrew
> 

Reply via email to