> There was already one time when code was commited and reverted later because > of misunderstanding on the way the code should be organized, last time it was > coding standard (which to be honest Soren has made clear twice already that > he follows pixman's coding style for xf86-video-qxl), so I agree it is a bad > way to go forward. Perhaps you can address Soren's concerns one to one (I > admit I don't remember them exactly without looking at the back log, but > you'd need to address Soren directly to proceed without invoking the > long-enough rule anyway).
Ah; I was unaware of the pixman coding convention; that is good to know. I believe I'm unable to edit this page: http://spice-space.org/developers.html but it might be good to put a note there. I believe I did address Soren's concerns directly in the original thread: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2012-September/010884.html about a month ago. This new thread is an attempt to resurrect the issue, and to understand how best to go about resolving non obvious issues. Cheers, Jeremy _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
