> ...that is the question. > > I started a thread here: > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/spice-devel/2012-September/010801.html > > on dealing with the (many) warnings in xf86-video-qxl. > > I think it boils down to one big question: are we willing to satisfy > gcc, or do we want to turn off warnings we dislike? > > I have a mild preference for the first approach, but I have a > *strong* > desire to have the warnings gone, however it is accomplished. > > That thread went dormant; I don't really have a clear sense of what > the > decision making process is here, or how to bring this to resolution. > > My plan is just to keep being a PITA until my @$@#$ warnings go away > <evil grin>.
I'm for the former, you can find an earlier patch of mine to remove the constant string related warnings that didn't go in. Actually I'm entirely with your order of preferences. > > Cheers, > > Jeremy > _______________________________________________ > Spice-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel > _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
