On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 07:22:34AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > Why do you want to require c99? Do the compilers we use on windows > > have > > good enough c99 support? > > Because we use c99: stdbool.h, inttypes.h, bool, variadic macros, // > comments, ... > > Actually, I wonder if 43c5b4f97334f0f4ca61bdd679b68d079575deac is redundant > if we use that patch.
Your patch looks better though if autoconf has dedicated macros to switch to c99 Christophe
pgpxwgd8RBRCE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
