It's an interesting thought. I haven't tried those. But I don't think the EFFs are searchable. Do you need them to be searchable?
Regards, Alex. Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr proficiency On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Ali Nazemian <alinazem...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Alexande, > What if I use ExternalFileFiled for the fields that I dont want to be > changed? Does that work for me? > Regards. > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Well, let us know when you figure out a way to satisfy all your >> requirements. >> >> Solr is designed for a full-document replace to be efficient at it's >> primary function (search). Any workaround require some sort of >> sacrifice. >> >> Good luck, >> Alex. >> Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ >> Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr >> proficiency >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Ali Nazemian <alinazem...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Updating documents will add some extra time to indexing process. (I send >> > the documents via apache Nutch) I prefer to make indexing as fast as >> > possible. >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch < >> arafa...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Can you use Update operation instead of Create? Then, you can supply >> >> only the fields that need to be changed and use atomic update to >> >> preserve the others. But then you will have issues when you _are_ >> >> creating new documents and you do need to store all fields. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Alex. >> >> Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ >> >> Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr >> >> proficiency >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Ali Nazemian <alinazem...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Dears, >> >> > Is there any way that I can do that in other way? >> >> > I mean if you look at my main problem again you will find out that I >> have >> >> > two types of fields in my documents. 1) The ones that should be >> >> overwritten >> >> > on duplicates, 2) The ones that should not change during duplicates. >> So >> >> Is >> >> > it another way to handle this situation from the first place? I mean >> >> using >> >> > cross join for example? >> >> > Assume I have a document with ID 2 which contains all the fields that >> can >> >> > be overwritten. And another document with ID 2 which contains all >> fields >> >> > that should not change during duplication detection. For selecting all >> >> > fields it is enough to do join on ID and for Duplication it is enough >> to >> >> > overwrite just document type 1. >> >> > Regards. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch < >> >> arafa...@gmail.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Well, it's implemented in SignatureUpdateProcessorFactory. Worst >> case, >> >> >> you can clone that code and add your preserve-field functionality. >> >> >> Could even be a nice contribution. >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Alex. >> >> >> >> >> >> Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ >> >> >> Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr >> >> >> proficiency >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Ali Nazemian <alinazem...@gmail.com> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Any suggestion would be appreciated. >> >> >> > Regards. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Ali Nazemian < >> alinazem...@gmail.com> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I used solr 4.8 for indexing the web pages that come from nutch. I >> >> know >> >> >> >> that solr deduplication operation works on uniquekey field. So I >> set >> >> >> that >> >> >> >> to URL field. Everything is OK. except that I want after >> duplication >> >> >> >> detection solr try not to delete all fields of old document. I >> want >> >> some >> >> >> >> fields remain unchanged. For example assume I have a data field >> >> called >> >> >> >> "read" with Boolean value "true" for specific document. I want all >> >> >> fields >> >> >> >> of new document overwrites except the value of this field. Is that >> >> >> >> possible? How? >> >> >> >> Regards. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> A.Nazemian >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > A.Nazemian >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > A.Nazemian >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > A.Nazemian >> > > > > -- > A.Nazemian
