Dear Alexande, What if I use ExternalFileFiled for the fields that I dont want to be changed? Does that work for me? Regards.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, let us know when you figure out a way to satisfy all your > requirements. > > Solr is designed for a full-document replace to be efficient at it's > primary function (search). Any workaround require some sort of > sacrifice. > > Good luck, > Alex. > Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ > Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr > proficiency > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Ali Nazemian <alinazem...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Updating documents will add some extra time to indexing process. (I send > > the documents via apache Nutch) I prefer to make indexing as fast as > > possible. > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch < > arafa...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Can you use Update operation instead of Create? Then, you can supply > >> only the fields that need to be changed and use atomic update to > >> preserve the others. But then you will have issues when you _are_ > >> creating new documents and you do need to store all fields. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Alex. > >> Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ > >> Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr > >> proficiency > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Ali Nazemian <alinazem...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Dears, > >> > Is there any way that I can do that in other way? > >> > I mean if you look at my main problem again you will find out that I > have > >> > two types of fields in my documents. 1) The ones that should be > >> overwritten > >> > on duplicates, 2) The ones that should not change during duplicates. > So > >> Is > >> > it another way to handle this situation from the first place? I mean > >> using > >> > cross join for example? > >> > Assume I have a document with ID 2 which contains all the fields that > can > >> > be overwritten. And another document with ID 2 which contains all > fields > >> > that should not change during duplication detection. For selecting all > >> > fields it is enough to do join on ID and for Duplication it is enough > to > >> > overwrite just document type 1. > >> > Regards. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch < > >> arafa...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> Well, it's implemented in SignatureUpdateProcessorFactory. Worst > case, > >> >> you can clone that code and add your preserve-field functionality. > >> >> Could even be a nice contribution. > >> >> > >> >> Regards, > >> >> Alex. > >> >> > >> >> Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ > >> >> Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr > >> >> proficiency > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Ali Nazemian <alinazem...@gmail.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > Any suggestion would be appreciated. > >> >> > Regards. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Ali Nazemian < > alinazem...@gmail.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> Hi, > >> >> >> I used solr 4.8 for indexing the web pages that come from nutch. I > >> know > >> >> >> that solr deduplication operation works on uniquekey field. So I > set > >> >> that > >> >> >> to URL field. Everything is OK. except that I want after > duplication > >> >> >> detection solr try not to delete all fields of old document. I > want > >> some > >> >> >> fields remain unchanged. For example assume I have a data field > >> called > >> >> >> "read" with Boolean value "true" for specific document. I want all > >> >> fields > >> >> >> of new document overwrites except the value of this field. Is that > >> >> >> possible? How? > >> >> >> Regards. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> A.Nazemian > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > A.Nazemian > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > A.Nazemian > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > A.Nazemian > -- A.Nazemian
