Thanks. That is probably worth a mention in the bug and release notes. --wunder
On Mar 17, 2014, at 9:33 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: > No, only QueryComponent.mergeIds() is only called for distributed queries. > > Steve > > On Mar 17, 2014, at 12:18 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote: > >> Does this bug happen in the non-sharded case? --wunder >> >> On Mar 17, 2014, at 9:15 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Martin, I’ve committed the SOLR-5875 fix, including to the lucene_solr_4_7 >>> branch. >>> >>> Any chance you could test the fix? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Steve >>> >>> On Mar 17, 2014, at 11:16 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Martin, >>>> >>>> You’re right, a bug was introduced by SOLOR-5354. I’ve opened an issue >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5875> and will commit the fix >>>> shortly. I hope to include this fix in a 4.7.1 release. >>>> >>>> Steve >>>> >>>> On Mar 8, 2014, at 1:32 AM, Martin de Vries <mar...@downnotifier.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> The memory leak seems to be in: >>>>>> org.apache.solr.handler.component.ShardFieldSortedHitQueue >>>>> >>>>> I think our issue might be related to this one, because this change has >>>>> been introduced in 4.7 and has changes to ShardFieldSortedHitQueue: >>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5354 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is the memory leak a bug, or should a full reindex help? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Martin >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Walter Underwood >> wun...@wunderwood.org >> >> >> > -- Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org
