No, only QueryComponent.mergeIds() is only called for distributed queries. Steve
On Mar 17, 2014, at 12:18 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote: > Does this bug happen in the non-sharded case? --wunder > > On Mar 17, 2014, at 9:15 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Martin, I’ve committed the SOLR-5875 fix, including to the lucene_solr_4_7 >> branch. >> >> Any chance you could test the fix? >> >> Thanks, >> Steve >> >> On Mar 17, 2014, at 11:16 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Martin, >>> >>> You’re right, a bug was introduced by SOLOR-5354. I’ve opened an issue >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5875> and will commit the fix >>> shortly. I hope to include this fix in a 4.7.1 release. >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> On Mar 8, 2014, at 1:32 AM, Martin de Vries <mar...@downnotifier.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> The memory leak seems to be in: >>>>> org.apache.solr.handler.component.ShardFieldSortedHitQueue >>>> >>>> I think our issue might be related to this one, because this change has >>>> been introduced in 4.7 and has changes to ShardFieldSortedHitQueue: >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5354 >>>> >>>> >>>> Is the memory leak a bug, or should a full reindex help? >>>> >>>> >>>> Martin >>> >> > > -- > Walter Underwood > wun...@wunderwood.org > > >
