It all depends. Sorry I don't have a feature list, but there are places in Solr that assume that the unique key field is a string, or at least convertible to a string. So, as long as you don't use any of those features of that unspecified list, you will be okay.

Is there any reason you require it to be an integer? I mean, isn't a numeric string good enough for your app?

-- Jack Krupansky

-----Original Message----- From: Ertio Lew
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2013 1:36 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can I use app specific document id as the document id that Solr uses for internal purposes?

@Jack Krupansky :
you can put whatever application value (hopefully a string) you want into
your unique key field.

Is there any issue if I use an integer field type for id ?


On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Jack Krupansky <j...@basetechnology.com>wrote:

Deep under the hood: Lucene is assigning a "Lucene document ID" when Solr
adds a document. In fact, Lucene will assign a new Lucene document ID if
you ask Solr to update or replace a document. That said, Solr generally
uses the value from your unique key field as its "internal" ID, and you can
put whatever application value (hopefully a string) you want into your
unique key field.

Generally, you should not be using the Lucene document ID. Stick to using
your unique key field values.

But if I understand your question properly, yes, you can index your "app
docId" in your Solr unique key field.

-- Jack Krupansky

-----Original Message----- From: Ertio Lew
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2013 4:46 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Can I use app specific document id as the document id that Solr
uses for internal purposes?


Could I just use my application specific document id as the document id
that solr uses for internal purposes, ie. indexing etc because I don't
store any other field other than id of the document(rest document data is
stored in DB).  In my schema the only thing that I store is the document
id, this is the only thing I want back from solr as results.

If I could do this I can prevent a few unnecessary lookups (while Solr
passes me back the query results) for mapping: solr docid-> my app docId.


Reply via email to