@Gora: you understood the schema correctly, but I can't believe it's strange but i think it is actually the recommended way.. you index your data but don't store in a Search engine, you store your actual data in DB, which is the right place for it. Data in SE should be just used for indexing. Isn't it ?
@maephisto: ok, thanks! On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Gora Mohanty <g...@mimirtech.com> wrote: > On 6 October 2013 16:36, Ertio Lew <ertio...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I meant that solr should not be thinking that it has to retrieve any > thing > > further (as in any stored document data) after once it gets the doc id, > so > > that one further look up for doc data is prevented. > [...] > > If I understood your setup correctly, the doc ID is the only field > in the Solr schema, and the only data stored in the Solr index. > So there is no question of recovering any other data. > > Having said that, this is a strange setup and seems to defeat the > whole purpose of a search engine. Maybe you could explain further > as to what you are trying to achieve: What does storing only doc > IDs in Solr gain you? You could as well get these from a database > lookup which it seems that you would be doing anyway. > > Regards, > Gora >
