@Jan Høydahl : do you mean "cutom filter" ?
@Walter Underwood : I also agree with you, I'd only use native functions
of Solr, but I do not know how to solve my problem ... My ACLs are
composed of thousands of groups (inheritance) that have deny / allow
user rights and who themselves have deny / allow rights and these rights
may change frequently.
I do not really see any solution to adopt, thank you for your help
Le 20/03/2013 15:48, Walter Underwood a écrit :
I agree. Your first step should not be trying to make Solr work they way your
think it should. Try really hard to use the existing features, they are there
because they solve a LOT of problems.
Updates are pretty fast, really.
wunder
On Mar 20, 2013, at 2:36 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
Don't try to optimize something which is not a problem.
This is what "everyone" does - update documents when ACLs for those documents
change, even with multi-million documents. It works like a charm. Or do you have a
special usecase where permissions for an average document changes several times a day? If
not, you should be fine!
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
20. mars 2013 kl. 10:01 skrev Christopher ARZUR
<[email protected]>:
Hello and thank you for your answers.
I'll try to explain my problem a little better:
The goal is to manage ACLs via Solr without reindex the documents at each
change of permission. I have hundreds of thousands of documents, users and
groups and permissions (allow / denied) or each of these groups of these users.
I read a lot of things about this and it seems that the binary compraison is
the best solution ... but I may be wrong :/
To do this I saw a plugin here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1913
with an example of this:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10HuqHkYjaEm6Q2ZrRCI0QQMLbbqtRv_NXDHcTjfCRfU/edit?
fold = 1
Unfortunately I have not managed to successfully install the plugin although I
followed the steps it seems ...
At the moment I left on a solution that is to use dynamic boolean fields but
I'm afraid to face performance issues on important volumetries in terms of
documents and fees.
I hope I have been more specific, I await your ideas because I'm not having
chosen the right solution ... small clarification: I discovered solr only a few
months ago: s
Thanks,
Christopher
--
Walter Underwood
[email protected]
