I agree. Your first step should not be trying to make Solr work they way your 
think it should. Try really hard to use the existing features, they are there 
because they solve a LOT of problems.

Updates are pretty fast, really.

wunder

On Mar 20, 2013, at 2:36 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote:

> Don't try to optimize something which is not a problem.
> 
> This is what "everyone" does - update documents when ACLs for those documents 
> change, even with multi-million documents. It works like a charm. Or do you 
> have a special usecase where permissions for an average document changes 
> several times a day? If not, you should be fine!
> 
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
> 
> 20. mars 2013 kl. 10:01 skrev Christopher ARZUR 
> <christopher.ar...@cognix-systems.com>:
> 
>> Hello and thank you for your answers.
>> I'll try to explain my problem a little better:
>> 
>> The goal is to manage ACLs via Solr without reindex the documents at each 
>> change of permission. I have hundreds of thousands of documents, users and 
>> groups and permissions (allow / denied) or each of these groups of these 
>> users.
>> 
>> I read a lot of things about this and it seems that the binary compraison is 
>> the best solution ... but I may be wrong :/
>> 
>> To do this I saw a plugin here: 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1913 with an example of this: 
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/10HuqHkYjaEm6Q2ZrRCI0QQMLbbqtRv_NXDHcTjfCRfU/edit?
>>  fold = 1
>> 
>> Unfortunately I have not managed to successfully install the plugin although 
>> I followed the steps it seems ...
>> 
>> At the moment I left on a solution that is to use dynamic boolean fields but 
>> I'm afraid to face performance issues on important volumetries in terms of 
>> documents and fees.
>> 
>> I hope I have been more specific, I await your ideas because I'm not having 
>> chosen the right solution ... small clarification: I discovered solr only a 
>> few months ago: s
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Christopher
> 

--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org



Reply via email to