First, did the index you moved get built with 3.x? In that case the fields won't be compressed. And things will be slower due 4.1 having to go through the back-compat layer. If you did do this, try optimizing since that'll re-write the index in 4.1 format (I'm pretty sure at least).
Second, fl _does_ matter, especially if you have lazy field loading enabled. Basically you'll have to load/uncompress all the fields mentioned in the fl list. Best Erick On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 4:53 PM, adityab <aditya_ba...@yahoo.com> wrote: > thanks Shawn, > I did try with specifying a fixed set of fl and with no score none gave any > better performance. > > We have a different VM with same index and Solr4.1 on Jboss 5.1 which does > perfectly fine with all the queries. So this is confusing us a bit more. > Have our VM expert to look now hopefully to find some solution. > > Aditya > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr3-5-Vs-Solr4-1-Help-please-tp4043543p4043786.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
