If your exact search returns more than one result, then by default they are sorted by the score.
Bill On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Otis Gospodnetic < otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > If you are doing a pure boolean search - something matches or doesn't match > and you don't care about scoring, relevancy, results order, then you can > turn off frequency. > See > > http://search-lucene.com/m/S27ja2IJStK1/turn+off+frequency&subj=Re+omitTermFreq+only+ > > Otis > -- > SOLR Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html > Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html > > > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Jie Sun <jsun5...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > this is related to my previous post where I did not get any feedback > yet... > > > > I am going through a practice to reduce the disk usage by solr index > files. > > > > first step I took was to move some fields from stored to not stored. this > > reduced the size of .fdt by 30-60%. > > > > very promising... however I notice the .frq are taking almost as much > disk > > space as the .fdt files. > > > > It seems .frq keeps the term frequency information. > > > > In our application, we only care about exact search (legal purpose), we > do > > not care about search results in relevance (by score) at all. > > > > does this mean I can omit the freq? is it feasible in solr to turn the > > frequency off? > > I do need phrase search so I will have to keep the .prx which is also the > > huge files similar to .fdt files. > > > > Any suggestions or inputs? > > thanks > > Jie > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/if-I-only-need-exact-search-does-frequency-score-matter-tp4026893.html > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
