BTW, when I said "I think to say anything intelligent" I meant "I think for _me_ to say anything intelligent". Didn't mean to be snarky....
Erick On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote: > "both servers are master and slave in the config file". So that means > they're polling each other? I think to say anything intelligent you're > going to have to provide more data. Please review: > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists. > > The bottom line here is that it sounds like what you're trying to do is > unusual enough that it's not a typical use case. I further suspect that > what you're trying to do will cause problems you haven't tested for. > > So I wouldn't do this. Simply configuring a proper master/slave setup will > give you HA out of the box. If a master goes down there's some complexity > in "promoting" one of your slaves and indexing any stale data. > > But I'd go with SolrCloud to "fire and forget" rather than try to force > Master/Slave to do something it wasn't intended to do. > > Best > Erick > > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:59 AM, jacques.cortes < > jacques.cor...@laposte.net> wrote: > >> Thanks Antoine. >> >> In fact, both solr servers are master and slave in config file. >> They have the same config file and replicate from the same master url with >> the vip. >> So, the master is on the server with the vip mounted on. >> And if heartbeat toggle, the role is toggled too. >> >> The question is : what can happend in this configuration? >> >> With tests, I can't see nothing bad, but I don't know the intern >> mecanisms. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-replication-tp4021875p4022314.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > >
