"both servers are master and slave in the config file". So that means they're polling each other? I think to say anything intelligent you're going to have to provide more data. Please review: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists.
The bottom line here is that it sounds like what you're trying to do is unusual enough that it's not a typical use case. I further suspect that what you're trying to do will cause problems you haven't tested for. So I wouldn't do this. Simply configuring a proper master/slave setup will give you HA out of the box. If a master goes down there's some complexity in "promoting" one of your slaves and indexing any stale data. But I'd go with SolrCloud to "fire and forget" rather than try to force Master/Slave to do something it wasn't intended to do. Best Erick On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:59 AM, jacques.cortes <jacques.cor...@laposte.net>wrote: > Thanks Antoine. > > In fact, both solr servers are master and slave in config file. > They have the same config file and replicate from the same master url with > the vip. > So, the master is on the server with the vip mounted on. > And if heartbeat toggle, the role is toggled too. > > The question is : what can happend in this configuration? > > With tests, I can't see nothing bad, but I don't know the intern mecanisms. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-replication-tp4021875p4022314.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
