It will download all changed files on disk. This might be the entire index. If 
the download succeeds, it will switch to the new index with no downtime.

Usually, search is a bit slower for a few minutes because it is starting with 
new caches.

wunder

On Aug 14, 2012, at 3:32 PM, Rohit Harchandani wrote:

> Cool. Thanks. I will have a look at this.
> But in this case, if all the files on the master are new, will the entire
> index on the slave be replaced or will it add to whatever is currently
> present on the slave?
> Thanks again,
> Rohit
> 
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Walter Underwood 
> <wun...@wunderwood.org>wrote:
> 
>> Why are you not using the built-in replication? That works fine. You do
>> not need to invent anything.
>> 
>> wunder
>> 
>> On Aug 14, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Rohit Harchandani wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi All,
>>> I am new to Solr and would really appreciate some help on this issue.
>>> I have a single core setup currently and have separate instances for
>>> querying and indexing. These two instances point to different data
>>> directories through symbolic links since I do not want it to affect the
>>> "live" searching instance.
>>> Once the indexing is done, I swap the directories to which the symbolic
>>> links point, so that the "live" searching instance now points to the
>>> directory where the new data was indexed. But this does not seem to work,
>>> without restarting solr.
>>> I guess my purpose can probably be acheived using multiple cores and
>>> SWAP(?), but wanted to know if there is a way to do this with a single
>>> core? Is there some command needed once the directories are swapped?
>>> I see in the core description, that the "directory" entry under "index"
>> did
>>> not change after updating the symlinks.
>>> 
>>> 
>> (org.apache.lucene.store.MMapDirectory:org.apache.lucene.store.MMapDirectory@
>> /bb/mbigd/mbig2580/srchSolr/apache-solr-4.0.0-ALPHA/example/solr/data/index
>>> lockFactory=org.apache.lucene.store.NativeFSLockFactory@2447e380)
>>> 
>>> Is there a way to update this dynamically? Thanks a lot
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Rohit Harchandani




Reply via email to