Cool. Thanks. I will have a look at this. But in this case, if all the files on the master are new, will the entire index on the slave be replaced or will it add to whatever is currently present on the slave? Thanks again, Rohit
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org>wrote: > Why are you not using the built-in replication? That works fine. You do > not need to invent anything. > > wunder > > On Aug 14, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Rohit Harchandani wrote: > > > Hi All, > > I am new to Solr and would really appreciate some help on this issue. > > I have a single core setup currently and have separate instances for > > querying and indexing. These two instances point to different data > > directories through symbolic links since I do not want it to affect the > > "live" searching instance. > > Once the indexing is done, I swap the directories to which the symbolic > > links point, so that the "live" searching instance now points to the > > directory where the new data was indexed. But this does not seem to work, > > without restarting solr. > > I guess my purpose can probably be acheived using multiple cores and > > SWAP(?), but wanted to know if there is a way to do this with a single > > core? Is there some command needed once the directories are swapped? > > I see in the core description, that the "directory" entry under "index" > did > > not change after updating the symlinks. > > > > > (org.apache.lucene.store.MMapDirectory:org.apache.lucene.store.MMapDirectory@ > /bb/mbigd/mbig2580/srchSolr/apache-solr-4.0.0-ALPHA/example/solr/data/index > > lockFactory=org.apache.lucene.store.NativeFSLockFactory@2447e380) > > > > Is there a way to update this dynamically? Thanks a lot > > > > Regards, > > Rohit Harchandani > > > > > >
