Ah, thanks for bringing closure. Should have occurred to me when I saw your query....
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Yuhao <nfsvi...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Good question. I checked the output sent to Jetty. In the case where it > returns a blank page, nothing at all is sent to Jetty. This raised my > suspicion that Solr never got a chance to process the query. Sure enough, it > led me to the finding that Jetty by default cannot take more than 4 KB of > header. After I increased that limit, everything works. > Problem solved. > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Yuhao <nfsvi...@yahoo.com> > Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:05 PM > Subject: Re: Strange things happen when I query with many facet.prefixes and > fq filters > > The very first question I have is "what do your Solr logs show"? I suspect > you'll see something interesting there. Otherwise, there's no way really to > say what's going on here without reproducing your setup... > > Best > Erick > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Yuhao <nfsvi...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm having issues when running the following query, which is produced by >> expanding several hierarchical facets (implemented the facet.prefix way). I >> realize it's pretty massive, but I'd like to figure out what exactly is >> causing the problem. Is it too many facet.prefix clauses, too many fq >> filters, the combo of both, or what. Anyway, here is the URL I start out >> with: >> >> http://40.163.5.153:920/solr/browse?&fq=Gene_Ontology_Associations%3A%220%2Fbiological_process%28GO%3A0008150%29%22&fq=Gene_Ontology_Associations%3A%221%2Fbiological_process%28GO%3A0008150%29%3Bmetabolic+process%28GO%3A0008152%29%22&fq=Gene_Ontology_Associations%3A%222%2Fbiological_process%28GO%3A0008150%29%3Bmetabolic+process%28GO%3A0008152%29%3Bsteroid+metabolic+process%28GO%3A0008202%29%22&fq=Gene_Ontology_Associations%3A%223%2Fbiological_process%28GO%3A0008150%29%3Bmetabolic+process%28GO%3A0008152%29%3Bsteroid+metabolic+process%28GO%3A0008202%29%3Bcholesterol+metabolic+process%28GO%3A0008203%29%22&fq=Mouse_Phenotype_Associations%3A%220%2Fmammalian+phenotype%28MP%3A0000001%29%22&fq=Mouse_Phenotype_Associations%3A%221%2Fmammalian+phenotype%28MP%3A0000001%29%3Bhomeostasis%2Fmetabolism+phenotype%28MP%3A0005376%29%22&fq=Mouse_Phenotype_Associations%3A%222%2Fmammalian+phenotype%28MP%3A0000001%29%3Bhomeostasis%2Fme >> tabolism+phenotype%28MP%3A0005376%29%3Babnormal+homeostasis%28MP%3A0001764%29%22&fq=Mouse_Phenotype_Associations%3A%223%2Fmammalian+phenotype%28MP%3A0000001%29%3Bhomeostasis%2Fmetabolism+phenotype%28MP%3A0005376%29%3Babnormal+homeostasis%28MP%3A0001764%29%3Babnormal+lipid+homeostasis%28MP%3A0002118%29%22&fq=Mouse_Phenotype_Associations%3A%224%2Fmammalian+phenotype%28MP%3A0000001%29%3Bhomeostasis%2Fmetabolism+phenotype%28MP%3A0005376%29%3Babnormal+homeostasis%28MP%3A0001764%29%3Babnormal+lipid+homeostasis%28MP%3A0002118%29%3Babnormal+cholesterol+homeostasis%28MP%3A0005278%29%22&fq=Mouse_Phenotype_Associations%3A%225%2Fmammalian+phenotype%28MP%3A0000001%29%3Bhomeostasis%2Fmetabolism+phenotype%28MP%3A0005376%29%3Babnormal+homeostasis%28MP%3A0001764%29%3Babnormal+lipid+homeostasis%28MP%3A0002118%29%3Babnormal+cholesterol+homeostasis%28MP%3A0005278%29%3Babnormal+cholesterol+level%28MP%3A0003947%29%22&fq=Mouse_Phenotype_Associations%3A%226%2Fm >> ammalian+phenotype%28MP%3A0000001%29%3Bhomeostasis%2Fmetabolism+phenotype%28MP%3A0005376%29%3Babnormal+homeostasis%28MP%3A0001764%29%3Babnormal+lipid+homeostasis%28MP%3A0002118%29%3Babnormal+cholesterol+homeostasis%28MP%3A0005278%29%3Babnormal+cholesterol+level%28MP%3A0003947%29%3Bdecreased+cholesterol+level%28MP%3A0003983%29%22&fq=Mouse_Phenotype_Associations%3A%227%2Fmammalian+phenotype%28MP%3A0000001%29%3Bhomeostasis%2Fmetabolism+phenotype%28MP%3A0005376%29%3Babnormal+homeostasis%28MP%3A0001764%29%3Babnormal+lipid+homeostasis%28MP%3A0002118%29%3Babnormal+cholesterol+homeostasis%28MP%3A0005278%29%3Babnormal+cholesterol+level%28MP%3A0003947%29%3Bdecreased+cholesterol+level%28MP%3A0003983%29%3Bdecreased+liver+cholesterol+level%28MP%3A0010026%29%22&fq=BKL_Diagnostic_Marker_Associations%3A%220%2FCardiovascular+Diseases%28MESH%3AD002318%29%22&fq=BKL_Molecular_Mechanism_Associations%3A%220%2FCardiovascular+Diseases%28MESH%3AD002318%29%22&fq= >> BKL_Diagnostic_Marker_Associations%3A%221%2FCardiovascular+Diseases%28MESH%3AD002318%29%3BArteriosclerosis%28MESH%3AD001161%29%22&q=&fq=BKL_Diagnostic_Marker_Associations:%222%2FCardiovascular+Diseases%28MESH%3AD002318%29%3BArteriosclerosis%28MESH%3AD001161%29%3BAtherosclerosis%28MESH%3AD050197%29%22&f.Gene_Ontology_Associations.facet.prefix=4%2Fbiological_process%28GO%3A0008150%29%3Bmetabolic+process%28GO%3A0008152%29%3Bsteroid+metabolic+process%28GO%3A0008202%29%3Bcholesterol+metabolic+process%28GO%3A0008203%29&f.Mouse_Phenotype_Associations.facet.prefix=8%2Fmammalian+phenotype%28MP%3A0000001%29%3Bhomeostasis%2Fmetabolism+phenotype%28MP%3A0005376%29%3Babnormal+homeostasis%28MP%3A0001764%29%3Babnormal+lipid+homeostasis%28MP%3A0002118%29%3Babnormal+cholesterol+homeostasis%28MP%3A0005278%29%3Babnormal+cholesterol+level%28MP%3A0003947%29%3Bdecreased+cholesterol+level%28MP%3A0003983%29%3Bdecreased+liver+cholesterol+level%28MP%3A0010026%29&a >> mp;f.BKL_Molecular_Mechanism_Associations.facet.prefix=1%2FCardiovascular+Diseases%28MESH%3AD002318%29 >> >> The above works fine. It's basically a bunch of fq= and facet.prefix= >> parameters. However, if I add another parameter, shown below, then I will >> instantly get a totally blank page, and I can't get it to load anything no >> matter what. (the parameter itself is fine since it works by itself or with >> fewer parameters) >> >> &f.BKL_Diagnostic_Marker_Associations.facet.prefix=3%2FCardiovascular+Diseases(MESH%3AD002318)%3BArteriosclerosis(MESH%3AD001161)%3BAtherosclerosis(MESH%3AD050197) >> >> Here's another interesting thing: if I just add the parameter field without >> any value, as in "&f.BKL_Diagnostic_Marker_Associations.facet.prefix=", then >> I will get a page of the result, but without any CSS rendering. >> >> Please advise what may be going on here. Is my query simply too big? Does >> Solr have a limit? Did I break the limit?