Erik, Do you have any details behind what would be required to write a tool to move from one index format to another? Any examples/suggestions would be appreciated.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> wrote: > What about modifying something like SolrIndexConfig.java to change the > lucene version that is used when creating the index? (may not be the > right place, but is something like this possible?) > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Right. Not sure what to advise you. We have worked on this problem with >> our LucidWorks platform and have some tools available to do this sort of >> thing, I think, but it's not generally something that you can do with Lucene >> going from a snapshot to a released version. Perhaps others with deeper >> insight will chime in. >> >> Erik >> >> >> >> On Dec 6, 2011, at 16:54 , Jamie Johnson wrote: >> >>> Problem is that really doesn't help me. We still have the same issue >>> that when the 4.0 becomes final there is no migration utility from >>> this pre 4.0 version to 4.0, right? >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Oh geez... no... I didn't mean 3.x JARs... I meant the trunk/4.0 ones that >>>> are there now. >>>> >>>> Erik >>>> >>>> On Dec 6, 2011, at 16:22 , Jamie Johnson wrote: >>>> >>>>> So if I wanted to used lucene index 3.5 with SolrCloud I "should" be >>>>> able to just move the 3.5 jars in and remove any of the snapshot jars >>>>> that are present when I build locally? >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Jamie - >>>>>> >>>>>> I think the best thing that you could do here would be to lock in a >>>>>> version of Lucene (all the Lucene libraries) that you use with >>>>>> SolrCloud. Certainly not out of the realm of possibilities of some >>>>>> upcoming SolrCloud capability that requires some upgrading of Lucene >>>>>> though, but you may be set for a little while at least. >>>>>> >>>>>> Erik >>>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 6, 2011, at 15:57 , Jamie Johnson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, but I don't believe that will do it. From my understanding >>>>>>> that does not control the index version written, it's used to control >>>>>>> the behavior of some analyzers (taken from some googling). I'd love >>>>>>> if someone told me otherwise though. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Alireza Salimi >>>>>>> <alireza.sal...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi, I'm not sure if it would help. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> in solrconfig.xml: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <!-- Controls what version of Lucene various components of Solr >>>>>>>> adhere to. Generally, you want to use the latest version to >>>>>>>> get all bug fixes and improvements. It is highly recommended >>>>>>>> that you fully re-index after changing this setting as it can >>>>>>>> affect both how text is indexed and queried. >>>>>>>> --> >>>>>>>> <luceneMatchVersion>LUCENE_34</luceneMatchVersion> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is there a way to specify the index version solr uses? We're >>>>>>>>> currently using SolrCloud but with the index format changing I'd be >>>>>>>>> preferable to be able to specify a particular index format to avoid >>>>>>>>> having to do a complete reindex. Is this possible? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Alireza Salimi >>>>>>>> Java EE Developer >>>>>> >>>> >>
