Hi James,
sorry for the noise but I am not able to using the approach described,
I'm sure I'm misconfiguring something.
Basically, I have 2 fields, `abstract` and `subject`, and a field
`master-dictionary` where the first to have ben copied.
Then, in solrconfig.xml I configured the SpellCheckComponent which
executes checks on master-dictionary field...
When I start Solr, raises an exception:
Oct 20, 2011 3:51:00 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Specified dictionary
does not exist.
at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.SpellCheckComponent.process(SpellCheckComponent.java:164)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:194)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:129)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1368)
at
org.apache.solr.core.QuerySenderListener.newSearcher(QuerySenderListener.java:54)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore$3.call(SolrCore.java:1177)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)
Can you help me please checking this schema[1]?
Many thanks in advance, all the best!
Simo
[1] https://gist.github.com/1301194
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Simone Tripodi
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi James!
> terrific suggestion, thanks a lot!!! And sorry for the delay (due to
> my timezone ;) )
> I'll let you know how things will go, thanks once again and have a nice day!
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Dyer, James <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> Simone,
>>
>> You can set up a "master" dictionary but with a few caveats. What you'll
>> need to do is <copyfield> all of the fields you want to include in your
>> "master" dictionary into one field and base your IndexBasedSpellChecker
>> dictionary on that. In addition, I would recommend you use the "collate"
>> feature and set "spellcheck.maxCollationTries" to something greater than
>> zero (5-10 is usually good). Otherwise, you probably will get a lot of
>> ridiculous suggestions from it trying to correct words from one field with
>> values from another. See
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.collate for more
>> information.
>>
>> There is still a big problem with approach, however. Unless you set
>> "onlyMorePopular=true", Solr will never suggest a correction for a word that
>> exists in the dictionary. By creating a huge "master" dictionary, you will
>> be increasing the chances that Solr will assume your users' misspelled words
>> are in fact correct. One way to work around this is instead of blindly
>> using "copyField", to hand-pick a subset of your terms for the master field
>> on which you base your dictionary. Another workaround is to use
>> "onlyMorePopular", although this has its own problems. See the discussion
>> for SOLR-2585 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2585), which aims
>> to solve these problems.
>>
>> James Dyer
>> E-Commerce Systems
>> Ingram Content Group
>> (615) 213-4311
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
>> Of Simone Tripodi
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 7:06 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: IndexBasedSpellChecker on multiple fields
>>
>> Hi all guys,
>> I need to configure the IndexBasedSpellChecker that uses more than
>> just one field as a spelling dictionary, is it possible to achieve?
>> In the meanwhile I configured two spellcheckers and let users switch
>> from a checkeer to another via params on GET request, but looks like
>> people are not particularly happy about it...
>> The main problem is that fields I need to speel contain different
>> informations, I mean the intersection between the two sets could be
>> empty.
>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>
