Hi James! terrific suggestion, thanks a lot!!! And sorry for the delay (due to my timezone ;) ) I'll let you know how things will go, thanks once again and have a nice day! Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Dyer, James <james.d...@ingrambook.com> wrote: > Simone, > > You can set up a "master" dictionary but with a few caveats. What you'll > need to do is <copyfield> all of the fields you want to include in your > "master" dictionary into one field and base your IndexBasedSpellChecker > dictionary on that. In addition, I would recommend you use the "collate" > feature and set "spellcheck.maxCollationTries" to something greater than zero > (5-10 is usually good). Otherwise, you probably will get a lot of ridiculous > suggestions from it trying to correct words from one field with values from > another. See > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.collate for more > information. > > There is still a big problem with approach, however. Unless you set > "onlyMorePopular=true", Solr will never suggest a correction for a word that > exists in the dictionary. By creating a huge "master" dictionary, you will > be increasing the chances that Solr will assume your users' misspelled words > are in fact correct. One way to work around this is instead of blindly using > "copyField", to hand-pick a subset of your terms for the master field on > which you base your dictionary. Another workaround is to use > "onlyMorePopular", although this has its own problems. See the discussion > for SOLR-2585 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2585), which aims > to solve these problems. > > James Dyer > E-Commerce Systems > Ingram Content Group > (615) 213-4311 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: simone.trip...@gmail.com [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > Simone Tripodi > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 7:06 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: IndexBasedSpellChecker on multiple fields > > Hi all guys, > I need to configure the IndexBasedSpellChecker that uses more than > just one field as a spelling dictionary, is it possible to achieve? > In the meanwhile I configured two spellcheckers and let users switch > from a checkeer to another via params on GET request, but looks like > people are not particularly happy about it... > The main problem is that fields I need to speel contain different > informations, I mean the intersection between the two sets could be > empty. > Many thanks in advance, all the best! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ >
