Hi Chris I understood how to handle this now. I tried and I am getting what I wanted.
Thanks for a very detailed explanation. I reversed the asc, desc part and was wondering that its not working as I wanted. After seeing the latest mail, I figured out my mistake. Thanks once again! On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org>wrote: > > : sort=map(map(myNumField,0,10,0),20,100,0) desc, score desc > : sort=map(map(myNumField,0,10,100),20,100,100) asc, score desc > ... > : By doing the second one, I expected to get the same results, ordered like > : 13, 17,18, 20. But, what I got were other values as results, that are not > in > : the chosen range: 9, 8,7, 5 etc. > : > : My question previously was: How to get results with "myNumFields" values > : between 10 and 20 ranked above the rest, in the ascending order. > > Hmmm.... w/o more info i'm not sure that i can explain the behavior you > are seeing. > > Using the 3x branch, with the 17 example docs indexed, i just tried these > queries... > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*+video+solr&fl=score,popularity&rows=100&sort=score+desc > > ...returns all 17 docs, ordered by score descending, and shows that all > the popularity values are between 0 and 10. > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*+video+solr&fl=score,popularity&rows=100&sort=map%28map%28popularity,0,5,0%29,8,10,0%29+desc,+score+desc > > ...reorders the docs so everything with a popularity value above 5 and > less then 8 is listed first, descending (ie: pop sevens then pop sixes), > followed by all other docs in order of score descending (regardless of the > popularity value) > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*+video+solr&fl=score,popularity&rows=100&sort=map%28map%28popularity,0,5,100%29,8,10,100%29+asc,+score+desc > > ...reorders the docs so everything with a popularity value above 5 and > less then 8 is listed first, ascending (ie: pop sixes then pop sevents), > followed by all other docs in order of score descending (regardless of the > popularity value) > > perhaps you could post your configs and some sample data in an easy to > consume format (csv?) demonstrating the problem you are seeing? > > -Hoss > -- Sowmya V.B. ---------------------------------------------------- Losing optimism is blasphemy! http://vbsowmya.wordpress.com ----------------------------------------------------
