: sort=map(map(myNumField,0,10,0),20,100,0) desc, score desc
: sort=map(map(myNumField,0,10,100),20,100,100) asc, score desc
...
: By doing the second one, I expected to get the same results, ordered like
: 13, 17,18, 20. But, what I got were other values as results, that are not in
: the chosen range: 9, 8,7, 5 etc.
:
: My question previously was: How to get results with "myNumFields" values
: between 10 and 20 ranked above the rest, in the ascending order.
Hmmm.... w/o more info i'm not sure that i can explain the behavior you
are seeing.
Using the 3x branch, with the 17 example docs indexed, i just tried these
queries...
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*+video+solr&fl=score,popularity&rows=100&sort=score+desc
...returns all 17 docs, ordered by score descending, and shows that all
the popularity values are between 0 and 10.
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*+video+solr&fl=score,popularity&rows=100&sort=map%28map%28popularity,0,5,0%29,8,10,0%29+desc,+score+desc
...reorders the docs so everything with a popularity value above 5 and
less then 8 is listed first, descending (ie: pop sevens then pop sixes),
followed by all other docs in order of score descending (regardless of the
popularity value)
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*+video+solr&fl=score,popularity&rows=100&sort=map%28map%28popularity,0,5,100%29,8,10,100%29+asc,+score+desc
...reorders the docs so everything with a popularity value above 5 and
less then 8 is listed first, ascending (ie: pop sixes then pop sevents),
followed by all other docs in order of score descending (regardless of the
popularity value)
perhaps you could post your configs and some sample data in an easy to
consume format (csv?) demonstrating the problem you are seeing?
-Hoss
