> Dismax queries can. But > > sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music') > > is not using dismax. Apparenty termfreq function can not? I am not > familiar with the termfreq function.
It simply returns the TF of the given _term_ as it is indexed of the current document. Sorting on TF like this seems strange as by default queries are already sorted that way since TF plays a big role in the final score. > > To understand why you'd need to reindex, you might want to read up on how > lucene actually works, to get a basic understanding of how different > indexing choices effect what is possible at query time. Lucene In Action > is a pretty good book. > > On 8/8/2011 5:02 PM, Jason Toy wrote: > > Are not Dismax queries able to search for phrases using the default > > index(which is what I am using?) If I can already do phrase searches, I > > don't understand why I would need to reindex t be able to access phrases > > from a function. > > > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Markus Jelsma<markus.jel...@openindex.io>wrote: > >>> Aelexei, thank you , that does seem to work. > >>> > >>> My sort results seem to be totally wrong though, I'm not sure if its > >>> because of my sort function or something else. > >>> > >>> My query consists of: > >>> sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')+desc&q=*:*&rows=100 > >>> And I get back 4571232 hits. > >> > >> That's normal, you issue a catch all query. Sorting should work but.. > >> > >>> All the results don't have the phrase "indie music" anywhere in their > >> > >> data. > >> > >>> Does termfreq not support phrases? > >> > >> No, it is TERM frequency and indie music is not one term. I don't know > >> how this function parses your input but it might not understand your + > >> escape and > >> think it's one term constisting of exactly that. > >> > >>> If not, how can I sort specifically by termfreq of a phrase? > >> > >> You cannot. What you can do is index multiple terms as one term using > >> the shingle filter. Take care, it can significantly increase your index > >> size and > >> number of unique terms. > >> > >>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Alexei Martchenko< > >>> > >>> ale...@superdownloads.com.br> wrote: > >>>> You can use the standard query parser and pass q=*:* > >>>> > >>>> 2011/8/8 Jason Toy<jason...@gmail.com> > >>>> > >>>>> I am trying to list some data based on a function I run , > >>>>> specifically termfreq(post_text,'indie music') and I am unable to > >> > >> do > >> > >>>>> it without passing in data to the q paramater. Is it possible to get > >>>>> a > >>>> > >>>> sorted > >>>> > >>>>> list without searching for any terms? > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> > >>>> *Alexei Martchenko* | *CEO* | Superdownloads > >>>> ale...@superdownloads.com.br | ale...@martchenko.com.br | (11) > >>>> 5083.1018/5080.3535/5080.3533
