> Aelexei, thank you , that does seem to work.
> 
> My sort results seem to be totally wrong though, I'm not sure if its
> because of my sort function or something else.
> 
> My query consists of:
> sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')+desc&q=*:*&rows=100
> And I get back 4571232 hits.

That's normal, you issue a catch all query. Sorting should work but..

> All the results don't have the phrase "indie music" anywhere in their data.
>  Does termfreq not support phrases?

No, it is TERM frequency and indie music is not one term. I don't know how 
this function parses your input but it might not understand your + escape and 
think it's one term constisting of exactly that.

> If not, how can I sort specifically by termfreq of a phrase?

You cannot. What you can do is index multiple terms as one term using the 
shingle filter. Take care, it can significantly increase your index size and 
number of unique terms.

> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Alexei Martchenko <
> 
> ale...@superdownloads.com.br> wrote:
> > You can use the standard query parser and pass q=*:*
> > 
> > 2011/8/8 Jason Toy <jason...@gmail.com>
> > 
> > > I am trying to list some data based on a function I run ,
> > > specifically  termfreq(post_text,'indie music')  and I am unable to do
> > > it without passing in data to the q paramater.  Is it possible to get
> > > a
> > 
> > sorted
> > 
> > > list without searching for any terms?
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > *Alexei Martchenko* | *CEO* | Superdownloads
> > ale...@superdownloads.com.br | ale...@martchenko.com.br | (11)
> > 5083.1018/5080.3535/5080.3533

Reply via email to