Because when browsing through legislation, people want to browse in the same order as it is actually printed in the hard copy volumes. It did work by using a copyfield to a lowercase field.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:29 AM, pravesh <suyalprav...@yahoo.com> wrote: > BTW, why r u sorting on this field? > You could also index & store this field twice. First, in its original value, > and then second, by encoding to some unique code/hash and index it and sort > on that. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sorting-tp3017285p3019055.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
