BTW, why r u sorting on this field? You could also index & store this field twice. First, in its original value, and then second, by encoding to some unique code/hash and index it and sort on that.
-- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sorting-tp3017285p3019055.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
