Hi, Thanks Erik, yes that's what I've done for now, but was wondering if it's the best way :)
thanks Praveen On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote: > Thinking out loud here, but would it work to just have ugly > categories? Instead of splitting them up, just encode them like > 1|a > 2|b > 3|c > > or some such. Then split them back up again and display > the name to the user and use the ID in the URL.... > > Best > Erick > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Prav Buz <buz.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Yes I already have different fields for category and category Id , and > they > > are in same order when retrieved from solr > > > > for eg: > > IDs > > 1 > > 3 > > 4 > > 5 > > names > > a > > b > > c > > d > > e > > > > id 1 is of name a and id 5 is of name e. but when I sort the category > names > > , looses this order as they are not related in any manner in the solr > docs. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Praveen > > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Gora Mohanty <g...@mimirtech.com> > wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Prav Buz <buz.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> [...] > >> > I need to show a facets on Category and then I need the category id in > >> the > >> > href link. For this what I 'm trying to do is create a field which > will > >> > store ID|Category in the schema and split it in the UI. > >> > Also I have Category and category id 's indexed . > >> [...] > >> > >> Why not have two different fields for category, and for category ID? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Gora > >> > > >
