Thinking out loud here, but would it work to just have ugly categories? Instead of splitting them up, just encode them like 1|a 2|b 3|c
or some such. Then split them back up again and display the name to the user and use the ID in the URL.... Best Erick On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Prav Buz <buz.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Yes I already have different fields for category and category Id , and they > are in same order when retrieved from solr > > for eg: > IDs > 1 > 3 > 4 > 5 > names > a > b > c > d > e > > id 1 is of name a and id 5 is of name e. but when I sort the category names > , looses this order as they are not related in any manner in the solr docs. > > > Thanks > > Praveen > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Gora Mohanty <g...@mimirtech.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Prav Buz <buz.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >> [...] >> > I need to show a facets on Category and then I need the category id in >> the >> > href link. For this what I 'm trying to do is create a field which will >> > store ID|Category in the schema and split it in the UI. >> > Also I have Category and category id 's indexed . >> [...] >> >> Why not have two different fields for category, and for category ID? >> >> Regards, >> Gora >> >
