Hi Otis,
Hello, You have many documents, 2 billion. Could you explain to me how this set yours? The mine is defined as follows, but using lucene. I have 3 machines and each machine with 6 each hds. Each hd this index with afragment of 10GB. Soon I have 3 servers search. Each server uses the lucene classParallelSerach using 6 hds and publish that server using the class RemoteSearch. My client connects these three machines using RMI. Everything is in using lucene.Using the classes that provide it. Please explain how you did the distribution of the index. How many hds you use formachine? What is the maximum size of index you use for HD? Are you using theSORL or lucene? How many instance you have the SOLR server on each machine? Sorry for so many questions. Gustavo Maia 2011/2/4 Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> > Gustavo, > > I haven't used RMI in 5 years, but last time I used it I remember it being > problematic - this is in the context of Lucene-based search involving some > 40 > different shards/servers, high query rates, and some 2 billion documents, > if I > remember correctly. I remember us wanting to get away from RMI to > something > simpler, less problematic, more HTTP-like. > > Otis > ---- > Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch > Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Gustavo Maia <gust...@goshme.com> > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Sent: Thu, February 3, 2011 1:05:16 PM > > Subject: What is the best protocol for data transfer rate HTTP or RMI? > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I am doing a comparative study between Lucene and Solr and wish to > obtain > > more concrete data on the data transfer using the lucene RemoteSearch > that > > uses RMI and data transfer of SOLR that uses the HTTP protocol. > > > > > > > > > > Gustavo Maia > > >
