Gustavo, I haven't used RMI in 5 years, but last time I used it I remember it being problematic - this is in the context of Lucene-based search involving some 40 different shards/servers, high query rates, and some 2 billion documents, if I remember correctly. I remember us wanting to get away from RMI to something simpler, less problematic, more HTTP-like.
Otis ---- Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ ----- Original Message ---- > From: Gustavo Maia <gust...@goshme.com> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Thu, February 3, 2011 1:05:16 PM > Subject: What is the best protocol for data transfer rate HTTP or RMI? > > Hello, > > > > I am doing a comparative study between Lucene and Solr and wish to obtain > more concrete data on the data transfer using the lucene RemoteSearch that > uses RMI and data transfer of SOLR that uses the HTTP protocol. > > > > > Gustavo Maia >
