Something like sliders perhaps?
Of course only numerical ranges can be put into sliders. (or a concept that
may be logically presented as some sort of ordening, such as "bad, hmm,
good, great"

Use Solr's Statscomponent to show the min and max values

Have a look at tripadvisor.com for good uses/implementation of sliders
(price, and reviewscore are presented as sliders)
my 2c: try to make the possible input values discrete (like at tripadvisor)
which gives a better user experience and limits the potential nr of queries
(cache-wise advantage)

Cheers,
Geert-Jan

2010/5/27 Mark Bennett <mbenn...@ideaeng.com>

> I'm a big fan of plain old text facets (or tags), displayed in some logical
> order, perhaps with a bit of indenting to help convey context. But as you
> may have noticed, I don't rule the world.  :-)
>
> Suppose you took the opposite approach, rending facets in non-traditional
> ways, that were still functional, and not ugly.
>
> Are there any pubic sites that come to mind that are displaying facets,
> tags, clusters, taxonomies or other navigators in really innovative ways?
>  And what you liked / didn't like?
>
> Right now I'm just looking for examples of what's been tried.  I suppose
> even bad examples might be educational.
>
> My future ideal wish list:
> * Stays out of the way (of casual users)
> * Looks "clean" and "cool" (to the power users)
>    I'm thinking for example a light gray chevron ">>" that casual users
> don't notice,
>    but when you click on it, cool things come up?
> * Probably that does not require Flash or SilverLight (just to avoid the
> whole platform wars)
>    I guess that means Ajax or HTML5
> * And since I'm doing pie in the sky, can be made to look good on desktops
> and mobile
>
> Some examples to get the ball rolling:
>
> StackOverflow, Flickr and YouTube, Clusty(now Yippy) are all nice, but a
> bit
> pedestrian for my mission today.
> (grokker was cool too)
>
> Lucid has done a nice job with Facets and Solr:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/
> And although I really like it, it's not a flashy enough specimen for what
> I'm hunting today.
> (and they should thread the actual results list)
>
> I did some mockups of "2.0 style" search navigators a couple years back:
>
> http://www.ideaeng.com/tabId/98/itemId/115/Search-20-in-the-Enterprise-Moving-Beyond-Singl.aspx
> Though these were intentionally NOT derived from specific web sites.
>
> Digg has done some cool stuff, for example:
> http://labs.digg.com/365/
> http://labs.digg.com/arc/
> http://labs.digg.com/stack/
> But for what I'm after, these are a bit too far off of the "searching for
> something in particular" track.
>
> Google Image Swirl and Similar Images are interesting, but for images.
> Lots of other cool stuff at labs.google.com
>
> Amazon, NewEgg, etc are all fine, but again text based.
>
> TouchGraph has some cool stuff, though very non-linear (many others on this
> theme)
> http://www.touchgraph.com/TGGoogleBrowser.html
> http://www.touchgraph.com/navigator.html
>
>
> Cool articles on the subject: (some examples now offline)
> http://www.cs.umd.edu/class/spring2005/cmsc838s/viz4all/viz4all_a.html
>
>
>
> --
> Mark Bennett / New Idea Engineering, Inc. / mbenn...@ideaeng.com
> Direct: 408-733-0387 / Main: 866-IDEA-ENG / Cell: 408-829-6513
>

Reply via email to