Hi Michael I exchanged a few mails with jteam, ultimately I realized my longitudes' signs were inverted so I was mapping to China instead of U.S. Still a bug, but inverting those longitudes "fixed" the problem in my case since I'm not running world-wide searches. Before that I ran a test to determine what radii failed for a grid of 3x3 lat/long with radius between 10 and 2500, if you're interested I can send you the results to compare. Also I'm running RC3, I see RC4 is out but haven't tried it. It would be interesting to see if this happens with the new spatial functions in trunk.
-- Mauricio On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Michael <solrco...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mauricio, > > I was wondering whether you had heard anything back from jteam > regarding this issue. I have also noticed it and was wondering why It > was happening. > > One thing I noticed is that this problem only appears for "sparse" > datasets as compared to "dense" ones. For example, I have two datasets > I've been testing with - one with 56 U.S. cities (the "sparse" set) > and one with over 197000 towns and cities (the "dense" set). The dense > set exhibited no problems with consistency searching at various radii, > but the sparse set exhibited the same issues you experienced. > > Michael D. > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Mauricio Scheffer > <mauricioschef...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's jteam's plugin ( http://www.jteam.nl/news/spatialsolr ) which AFAIK > is > > just the latest patch for SOLR-773 packaged as a stand-alone plugin. > > > > I'll try to contact jteam directly. > > > > Thanks > > Mauricio > > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org > >wrote: > > > >> > >> On Dec 28, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Mauricio Scheffer wrote: > >> > >> > q={!spatial lat=43.705 long=116.3635 radius=100}*:* > >> > >> What's QParser is the "spatial" plugin? I don't know of any such QParser > in > >> Solr. Is this a third party tool? If so, I'd suggest asking on that > list. > >> > >> > > >> > with no other parameters. > >> > When changing the radius to 250 I get no results. > >> > > >> > In my config I have startTier = 9 and endTier = 17 (default values) > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsi...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> What do your queries look like? > >> >> > >> >> On Dec 28, 2009, at 9:30 AM, Mauricio Scheffer wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Hi everyone, > >> >>> I'm getting inconsistent behavior from Spatial Solr when searching > with > >> >>> different radii. For the same lat/long I get: > >> >>> > >> >>> radius=1 -> 1 result > >> >>> radius=10 -> 0 result > >> >>> radius=25 -> 2 results > >> >>> radius=100 -> 2 results > >> >>> radius=250 -> 0 results > >> >>> > >> >>> I don't understand why radius=10 and 250 return no results. Is this > a > >> >> known > >> >>> bug? I'm using the default configuration as specified in the PDF. > >> >>> BTW I also tried LocalSolr with the same results. > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks > >> >>> Mauricio > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> -------------------------- > >> Grant Ingersoll > >> http://www.lucidimagination.com/ > >> > >> Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene: > >> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search > >> > >> > > >
