Mauricio, I was wondering whether you had heard anything back from jteam regarding this issue. I have also noticed it and was wondering why It was happening.
One thing I noticed is that this problem only appears for "sparse" datasets as compared to "dense" ones. For example, I have two datasets I've been testing with - one with 56 U.S. cities (the "sparse" set) and one with over 197000 towns and cities (the "dense" set). The dense set exhibited no problems with consistency searching at various radii, but the sparse set exhibited the same issues you experienced. Michael D. On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Mauricio Scheffer <mauricioschef...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's jteam's plugin ( http://www.jteam.nl/news/spatialsolr ) which AFAIK is > just the latest patch for SOLR-773 packaged as a stand-alone plugin. > > I'll try to contact jteam directly. > > Thanks > Mauricio > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>wrote: > >> >> On Dec 28, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Mauricio Scheffer wrote: >> >> > q={!spatial lat=43.705 long=116.3635 radius=100}*:* >> >> What's QParser is the "spatial" plugin? I don't know of any such QParser in >> Solr. Is this a third party tool? If so, I'd suggest asking on that list. >> >> > >> > with no other parameters. >> > When changing the radius to 250 I get no results. >> > >> > In my config I have startTier = 9 and endTier = 17 (default values) >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> What do your queries look like? >> >> >> >> On Dec 28, 2009, at 9:30 AM, Mauricio Scheffer wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi everyone, >> >>> I'm getting inconsistent behavior from Spatial Solr when searching with >> >>> different radii. For the same lat/long I get: >> >>> >> >>> radius=1 -> 1 result >> >>> radius=10 -> 0 result >> >>> radius=25 -> 2 results >> >>> radius=100 -> 2 results >> >>> radius=250 -> 0 results >> >>> >> >>> I don't understand why radius=10 and 250 return no results. Is this a >> >> known >> >>> bug? I'm using the default configuration as specified in the PDF. >> >>> BTW I also tried LocalSolr with the same results. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks >> >>> Mauricio >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------- >> Grant Ingersoll >> http://www.lucidimagination.com/ >> >> Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene: >> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search >> >> >
