Mark, first off thanks for the response. Im glad someone is around today ;)
So this is what I have so far:
<solr persistent="true" sharedLib="lib">
<cores adminPath="/admin/cores" shareSchema="true">
<core name="items-live" instanceDir="items" default="true"
dataDir="data/live"/>
<core name="items-offline" instanceDir="items" default="true"
dataDir="data/offline"/>
</cores>
</solr>
So my directory structure is:
home/items/data/live/index
home/items/data/offline/index
So after playing around I see that swap literally just swaps the dataDir in
solr.xml. I have peristent = true so it saves which core is pointing to
which dataDir. So where I think I am a little confused is the naming
convention I used above. In this type of setup there is no such thing as a
live or offline dataDir as at any point they can be one or the other... the
core name is what really matters. So Im guessing this naming convention
makes a little more sense
<solr persistent="true" sharedLib="lib">
<cores adminPath="/admin/cores" shareSchema="true">
<core name="items-live" instanceDir="items" default="true"
dataDir="data/core0"/>
<core name="items-offline" instanceDir="items" default="true"
dataDir="data/core1"/>
</cores>
</solr>
Sine the actually dataDir name really doesnt mean anything. Is this the
correct reasoning?
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Multicore-process-tp681929p682088.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
