Yes, payloads should do this. On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Jon Baer <jonb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Isn't this what Lucene/Solr payloads are theoretically for? > > ie: > http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/08/05/getting-started-with-payloads/ > > - Jon > > On Mar 8, 2010, at 11:15 PM, Lance Norskog wrote: > >> This is an interesting idea. There are other projects to make the >> analyzer/filter chain more "porous", or open to outside interaction. >> >> A big problem is that queries are analyzed, too. If you want to give >> the same metadata to the analyzer when doing a query against the >> field, things get tough. You would need a special query parser to >> implement your own syntax to do that. However, the analyzer chain in >> the query phase does not receive the parsed query, so you have to in >> some way change this. >> >> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:14 AM, dbejean <dominique.bej...@eolya.fr> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> If I write a custom analyser that accept a specific attribut in the >>> constructor >>> >>> public MyCustomAnalyzer(String myAttribute); >>> >>> Is there a way to dynamically send a value for this attribute from Solr at >>> index time in the XML Message ? >>> >>> <add> >>> <doc> >>> <field name="content" myattribute="...">.....</field> >>> >>> >>> Obviously, in Sorl shema.xml, the "content" field is associated to my custom >>> Analyser. >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Dominique >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://old.nabble.com/More-contextual-information-in-analyser-tp27819298p27819298.html >>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Lance Norskog >> goks...@gmail.com > >
-- Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com
