Isn't this what Lucene/Solr payloads are theoretically for? ie: http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/08/05/getting-started-with-payloads/
- Jon On Mar 8, 2010, at 11:15 PM, Lance Norskog wrote: > This is an interesting idea. There are other projects to make the > analyzer/filter chain more "porous", or open to outside interaction. > > A big problem is that queries are analyzed, too. If you want to give > the same metadata to the analyzer when doing a query against the > field, things get tough. You would need a special query parser to > implement your own syntax to do that. However, the analyzer chain in > the query phase does not receive the parsed query, so you have to in > some way change this. > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:14 AM, dbejean <dominique.bej...@eolya.fr> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> If I write a custom analyser that accept a specific attribut in the >> constructor >> >> public MyCustomAnalyzer(String myAttribute); >> >> Is there a way to dynamically send a value for this attribute from Solr at >> index time in the XML Message ? >> >> <add> >> <doc> >> <field name="content" myattribute="...">.....</field> >> >> >> Obviously, in Sorl shema.xml, the "content" field is associated to my custom >> Analyser. >> >> Thank you. >> >> Dominique >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/More-contextual-information-in-analyser-tp27819298p27819298.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > Lance Norskog > goks...@gmail.com
