For me, the Java replication is nice because it's much easier to set up and has fewer moving pieces (vs. rsync server, scripts config file, event hook, external shell scripts).
Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- > From: Jason Rutherglen <jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Tue, December 8, 2009 7:44:07 PM > Subject: Re: Replicating multiple cores > > > Yes. I'd highly recommend using the Java replication though. > > Is there a reason? I understand it's new etc, however I think one > issue with it is it's somewhat non-native access to the filesystem. > Can you illustrate a real world advantage other than the enhanced > admin screens? > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar > wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Jason Rutherglen < > > jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> If I've got multiple cores on a server, I guess I need multiple > >> rsyncd's running (if using the shell scripts)? > >> > > > > Yes. I'd highly recommend using the Java replication though. > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. > >
